A Revolutionizing Writing Strategies in the AI Era Enhancing Critical Thinking through Genre-Based and Task-Based Approaches in the English for Busines

Authors

  • Jufidah Jufidah Politeknik eLBajo Commodus
  • Maria Beatrix Rahinart Wellalangi Politeknik eLBajo Commodus
  • Dominikus Seno Politeknik eLBajo Commodus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37755/sjip.v11i1.1758

Keywords:

Strategi Penulisan, Pendekatan Berbasis Genre , Pembelajaran Berbasis Tugas, Komunikasi Bisnis

Abstract

  ABSTRACT This study investigated the transformative potential of genre-based and task-based writing strategies in fostering critical thinking and writing proficiency within the English for Business and Professional Communication Study Program at Politeknik eLBajo Commodus. Through a qualitative case study involving 8 students in English for Creative Writing and English for Correspondence courses, the research examined challenges such as limited genre knowledge and difficulties in generating original ideas, alongside the role of artificial intelligence (AI) as a supportive tool. Data were collected over 12 weeks through document analysis, interviews, and classroom observations. Findings revealed that genre-based strategies enhanced students’ mastery of text conventions, while task-based activities, aligned with the 80% practice-oriented vocational curriculum, boosted motivation and self-efficacy. AI facilitated grammar correction and idea generation but posed risks of over-reliance and unintentional plagiarism, underscoring the need for explicit instructor guidance. Key strategies, including model text analysis, iterative writing with feedback, and real-world business scenario simulations, significantly improved writing quality and critical thinking. This study offered actionable insights for vocational instructors to integrate AI purposefully and contributed to the literature on innovative writing instruction in business communication.   Keywords: Writing Strategy, Genre-Based Approach, Task-Based Learning, Business Communication

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.).

(2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing

self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307-337). Information Age Publishing.

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2015). Qualitative case

study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 20(4), 545-559.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic

analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of

qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018).

Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A

theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.

Finlay, L. (2002). "Outing" the researcher: The

provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545.

Fitria, T. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI)

in teaching English: Advantages and disadvantages. Journal of English Teaching and Research, 8(1), 45-60.

Flowerdew, J., & Wang, S. H. (2015). Identity

in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 81-99.

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing

(2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Kessler, G. (2020). Technology and the future

of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 54(3), 561-583.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews:

Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985).

Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated

learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016).

Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2023).

Vocational education outcomes report 2023. Jakarta: Directorate General of Vocational Education.

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language

teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014).

Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation.

Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study

research. Sage Publications.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English

in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The

development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design

and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31 — Updated on 2025-07-31

Versions

How to Cite

Jufidah, J., Beatrix Rahinart Wellalangi , M. ., & Seno, D. . (2025). A Revolutionizing Writing Strategies in the AI Era Enhancing Critical Thinking through Genre-Based and Task-Based Approaches in the English for Busines. Serunai : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.37755/sjip.v11i1.1758