Rekonstruksionisme Pendidikan sebagai Strategi Pemberdayaan: Membangun Literasi Kritis Melalui Pembelajaran Transformatif

Dian Perayanti  Sinaga; Mahriyuni Mahriyuni

doi:10.37755/sjip.v12i1.2442

Authors

Dian Perayanti Sinaga
Mahriyuni Mahriyuni

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37755/sjip.v12i1.2442

Keywords:

rekonstruksionisme, literasi kritis, pemberdayaan, pembelajaran transformatif, pedagogi

Abstract

Studi filosofis ini mengkaji rekonstruksionisme pendidikan sebagai strategi pemberdayaan melalui pembelajaran transformatif. Menggunakan literature review kualitatif, penelitian menganalisis fondasi filosofis dan implikasi praktis pendidikan rekonstruksionis dalam mengembangkan literasi kritis. Temuan menunjukkan rekonstruksionisme menawarkan kerangka komprehensif untuk pemberdayaan dengan memposisikan peserta didik sebagai agen perubahan sosial kritis. Tiga dimensi utama teridentifikasi: (1) rekonstruksi epistemologis pengetahuan, (2) transformasi pedagogis melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah, dan (3) pemberdayaan sosial melalui pengembangan kesadaran kritis. Studi menyimpulkan pedagogi rekonstruksionis secara signifikan meningkatkan literasi kritis sambil memupuk tanggung jawab sosial peserta didik. Implikasi bagi desain kurikulum dan program persiapan guru di Indonesia dibahas.

References

Apple, M. W. (2013). Can education change society? Routledge.

Bray, M., & Kwo, O. (2013). Regulating private institutions and tutoring: Policy options for supplementary education in Asia. Comparative Education Review, 57(1), 1-25.

Brameld, T. (1956). Toward a reconstructed philosophy of education. Dryden Press.

Counts, G. S. (1932). Dare the school build a new social order? The John Day Company.

Cranton, P. (2006). Understanding and promoting transformative learning: A guide for educators of adults (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder & Herder.

Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Bergin & Garvey.

Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. Bergin & Garvey.

Hasmira, H., & Warsono, W. (2022). Implementasi kurikulum merdeka di sekolah menengah atas: Tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(2), 123-135.

hooks, b. (1994). Teaching as a practice of freedom. Routledge.

Jalal, F., Samani, M., Chang, M. C., Stevenson, R., Bagti, M., & Negara, S. D. (2009). Teacher certification in Indonesia: A strategy for teacher quality improvement. World Bank.

Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. Routledge.

Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on measuring women's empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435-464.

Kemendikbud. (2021). Kebijakan kurikulum merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Lankshear, C., & McLaren, P. L. (Eds.). (1993). Critical literacy: Politics, praxis, and the postmodern. State University of New York Press.

Lewison, M., Leland, C., & Harste, J. C. (2002). Taking critical stances: A curriculum guide. Language Arts, 80(1), 37-46.

McGregor, S. L. T., & Murnane, J. A. (2010). Paradigm, methodology and method: Intellectual integrity in consumer scholarship. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(4), 419-427.

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.

Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5-12.

Rugg, H. (1947). Foundations for American education. World Book Company.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.

Suryadarma, D. (2012). How corruption diminishes the effectiveness of public spending on education in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 48(1), 85-100.

Taylor, E. W. (2008). Transformative learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 119, 5-15.

UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO Publishing.

Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43-63). Kluwer Academic/Plenum.